Anne Lee and Board of St. Joseph’s hospital attempts to deport singe mother. Fabricate emotional affair with Daniel Giersch

Anne Lee, residing at 24742 Evereve Cir, Lake Forest, CA; 24331 Muirlands Blvd, Lake Forest, CA, Eric Speare and the board of the St. Joseph Hospital have attempted to deport a single mother.

They have fabricated false records which were provided to Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner.  Anne Lee fabricated a report specifying that single mother has emotional affairs with Daniel Giersch and is highly sexualized based on the masturbation fantasy that Anne Lee has invented around single mother. She has fixated on this obsession and continues to do so. The single mother does not know Daniel Giersch nor does she have an affair with this person and she refuses to do so.  The emotional fixation that Anne Lee has created is harming the reputation of a single mother who refuses to associate with the individuals that are “picked” by Anne Lee as suitable.   This single mother refuses to be associated with Daniel Giersch.

The board voted to deport a single mother based on their fabrications against this mother. Not a single member of this board considered that single mothers have rights in the United States including the right to protect their children from their horrendous conduct and abuse. They even had the audacity to vote to commit a single mother who is not a patient of any of their doctors. This horrendous conduct would shock any normal, decent human being to an unbelievable degree as this type of conduct is not legally possible in the United States.

The board members consist of the following people: https://www.mission4health.com/mission-hospital-foundation/about-the-foundation/foundation-board-of-directors/

Daniel Giersch offered to pay both Anne Lee and Eric Speare $ 100,000 to stop their harassment and stalking of a single mother with children. The refuse insisting on their cruel and unusual punishment centered around their own shocking conduct which is not based on anything resembling medical are.

They have discussed driving a single mother to the breaking point to harm her children so that their mother is not in their life and they refuse to stop with the harassment, stalking and association of people the are not in the life of the single mother. They fabricate issues that do not exist in the life of a single mother and flood the children’s school with these issues defaming the children in the process,

They are desperate to create an emotionally distressing situation for the children. They paraded a list of people on 2/13/2018 centered around the alleged emotional affair with Daniel Giersch and the other defamations associated with that affair requesting these people to identify a single mother based on a video that they broadcast to these people, violating CA penal code 632. Anne Lee has invented and fabricated so many issues around this single mother to prevent that she obtain legal redress and is able to enforce any restraining orders in this state. She fabricates report when she is not a medical provider of a single mother and cannot release them anyway due to HIPPA violations if a medical provider relationship even existed,

The escalating harassment, stalking persecution is based on the offer of Daniel Giersch to pay to stop the outrageous conduct and cruel and unseal punishment that a single mother is exposed to.

Ann Lee is an abusive psychopath who refuses to admit that she is a cruel, degrading, vindictive person who has only thought in mind and that is to harm domestic violence victims and their children at all cost based on issues that absolutely do not exist but are created and fabricated by Anne Lee.

Anne Lee has created a treatment obsession around a single mother based on the emotional issues fabricated by Ann Lee. She refuses to admit that she is not a medical provider that has treated this single mother despite her desperate obsession to portray this image to abuse the name of the single mother at all cost.

 

 

Advertisements
By San Bernardino and Riverside Superior Court News

Persecution by the Indio Riverside Superior Court Family Law Department

Persecution is defined as a program or campaign to exterminate, drive away, or subjugate a people because of their religion, race or beliefs.

This is exactly what the Riverside Superior Court family law department does with parents and their children. Parents are persecuted because of their race, their nationality, the FACT that they are the parents of children which this court refuses to acknowledge.

The point of the court’s subjugation exercise is to keep people tied to a truly insane court system where malice, bias, persecution and subjugation is the form of law practiced and to keep parents tied to an abusive situation.

There is no adherence to the law. There is no adherence to the best interest of the child standard. Children are tools to perpetuate the persecution and subjugation of said parent(s).

Many parents originate from countries with the most outrageous human rights violation where the history of that country has revolved around implementing a civilized country where equal rights under the law are paramount, where persecution of one particular class of society is prohibited and where RESPECT for cultural values and beliefs is integrated into society. These parents are aware of the societal dynamics involved with racism, discrimination, persecution, and the absolute witch hunt against one segment of the population.

This is exactly the behavior that is advocated and maliciously perpetuated by the Riverside Superior Court sadistic judiciary who legally rapes, persecutes and batters parents for years; with no relief in sight.

Perhaps the court can save parents time and just implement a burning of the stake scenario where select parents are incinerated, as this is the mentality that prevails. LAW is not relevant in that court.

By San Bernardino and Riverside Superior Court News

CA court of appeal stats 8/5/2014

Court of Appeal, Superior Court and Supreme Court News

 A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.

Date PostedDocket #/
File Format
DescriptionWhen filedCase TypeDecisionAppellant self representedJustice drafting opinion
08/05/14B246573
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Sanchez CA2/8 filed 8/5/14   Case Details01/30/13craffirmnoKussman
08/05/14B242081
[PDF] [DOC]
Amin’s Oil v. Biswas CA2/8 filed 8/5/14   Case Details06/21/12civilaffirmnoGrimes
08/05/14G048628
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Randolph CA4/3 filed 8/5/14   Case Details06/26/13craffirmnoBedsworth
08/05/14B253123
[PDF] [DOC]
In re L.R. CA2/8 filed 8/5/14   Case Details11/06/13juvenileappeal dismissednoRubin
08/05/14B252629
[PDF] [DOC]
In re Jose A. CA2/3 filed 8/5/14   Case Details10/29/13juvenile delinquentThe matter is remanded and the juvenile…

View original post 1,152 more words

By San Bernardino and Riverside Superior Court News

CA Court of Appeal stats 7/28-7/29/2014

Court of Appeal, Superior Court and Supreme Court News

A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.

Date PostedDocket #/

File Format

DescriptionWhen filedCase TypeDecisionAppellant self representedJustice drafting opinion
07/29/14G049662

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Williams CA4/3 filed 7/29/14 Case Details09/12/12crThe imposition of restitution and parole revocation restitution fines are

reversed with directions to reconsider the fines consistent with this opinion.

noIkola
07/29/14A139891

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Sally L. CA1/5 filed 7/29/14 Case Details09/20/13juvenileaffirm A child who has been adjudged a dependent of the

juvenile court should not be deprived of an adoptive parent when the natural parent has

maintained a relationship that may be beneficial to some degree, but that does not meet

the child’s need for a parent

noSimons
07/29/14A139778

[PDF] [DOC]

Alston…

View original post 2,170 more words

By San Bernardino and Riverside Superior Court News